Skip to content

The power of ‘humble data’

26 April 2016

Last week, Joe Ferns introduced the Big Lottery Fund’s plan for knowledge & learning, along with how we’d use data in the future. Today, Diana Barran, chief executive at SafeLives – the national charity dedicated to ending domestic violence – gives her take on knowledge and ‘humble data’

A number of the points in Joe’s blog really resonated with the experience we have had at SafeLives over the past few years, as we have tried to capture, aggregate, understand and use more data about the work of the many small specialist domestic abuse services around the country.logo

Joe talks about having a sense of purpose and being clear about why you are keeping the data.  We were clear that we wanted the voice and experience of the victim to be captured systematically and then analysed and shared with those who needed to hear it – everyone from the frontline practitioner, and the manager of the service to commissioners, funders and policy makers. We aim to never ask for a practitioner to record any data that they would not normally keep for the purposes of good case management. Our Insight’s dataset has information on over 50,000 adult victims, children and young people collected by about 50 different domestic abuse services.

And it has been the ‘humble data’ – the data about who accesses services, where they access them, how long they have to wait before getting help and what their needs are, that have proved to be powerful and actionable.

A few examples:

  • Domestic abuse has a terrible impact on the mental health of both the victim and their children.  But our data showed major variations in levels of disclosure of mental health problems – from under 10% to over 60%.  The obvious question is why? What emerged is that the setting of the service and confidence of the practitioner are key to eliciting a disclosure.  Domestic abuse practitioners based in hospitals saw twice the level of disclosure than their colleagues in community settings.  Local services are using this information to negotiate co-location in A&E or with the local mental health team.  The result?  Big increases in disclosures and a better response for victims.
  • We can see the lack of provision for older women, many of whom live with abuse for over 20 years before they get help.  This is a simple message for funders to hear and respond to in their grant making.  Other messages about inequality of access that have relevance to funders, commissioners and policy makers are crystal clear in relation to barriers for B&ME victims to the criminal justice system, for working women to refuge provision and for LGBT communities. Click here for more of our data on this issue

None of this is to say that outcome data isn’t important.  Of course it is. The joy of the humble stuff – especially when it is aggregated – is that the evidence is solid, the messages self evident and the resulting action benefits those who we are aiming to support in a way that no charity analysing its work on its own could reasonably do.  And crucially, it can often be achieved without a big price tag attached.

 

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: